Willis, the only woman that actually is inferior to men is your blow up doll.
Deflate her and talk to some real women, you'll realize their our equals kinda quick.

 

@Femme Fatale:
I love your siggy, darlin'. You can talk to me anytime you need to. Down & depressed, upset & angry, bright & cheerful, perturbed & pensive - it's all good! Just drop me a line, yeah? ^_^

@Willis:
You're an idiot. If you're going to post up something to stir up a little controversy, at least have the dignity to be intelligent first. Otherwise, you just sound like a real-life Monty Python character, "She's a witch! She turned me into a Newt!.... Wha? Well, I got beh'er!.." Dumbass. -.-

@The various forum goers:
I have to agree with the premise of this thread, to an extent. Others are right in their claims that men and women are mostly equal, and that they tend to make good compliments of one another. However, just as individual growth dictates total worth, so, too, does situational needs dictate usefulness.

For instance, if I was going to war, I wouldn't want a woman next to me. Now, this isn't to say that she's slower, weaker, or of an inferior intellect whilest on the battlefield than I. The problem arises with instinct. Being a Breeder, when I'm around women, I become "Mr. Protector." In a war situation, this is likely to get myself, and possibly others, killed as I attempt to keep one person constantly under my watchful gaze instead of looking about for ambushes and snipers. In this case, the female is a liability not because she is inferior, but because of hardwired nature.

Men are, typically, more hearty than women, and we tend to withstand more punishment, childbirth excluded. As such, to counter the easy argument of, "Well, why not make an army of all women," I would say that the next time a woman mouths off to you, strike her forcefully See what her immediate response is. Now, do the same with the next male that mouths off to you, and see what his immediate response is. You'll undoubtedly notice that the male, being built around high levels of testosterone (making us angry) and adrenaline (making us feel invincible), is more apt to withstand and come-back from the blow than the female. Thus, men, who are built to fight like our ape brethren, are the better soldier, not because we're smarter, stronger, faster, etc., but because we can withstand more physical torment, react more appropriately to it, and, ultimately, tend to relish in it!

In another instance, if trying to communicate with a group of individuals, the message being given and its intended recipients should dictate the gender of the messenger. I say this because studies show that people react better to bad news when it's from a predetermined type of person. If telling a group of men that they've lost their job, a woman should not be used, as she will quickly become the target of their tempers. This is, again, due to the male protective instinct. If we have no job, how can we take care of ourselves and our families? If a strong, commanding male figure gives that same message, the other men are far less apt to cause too much drama, as the instinctual social order will have kicked in and, with a few "abstract" or "trouble-making" individuals not-withstanding, the group of males will back down. It's not unlike a wolf-pack in that sense.

Along the same note, if heart-breaking news is to be given to either men or women, or the same harsh news stated above is to be given on a one-on-one basis, it is best that a woman do so. This is because women tend to be, instinctively, motherly and empathetic. They will cry with you, comfort you, tell you it's going to be alright or you'll make it through the hard times, etc. Men and women both tend to respond well to a sympathetic female figure.

In terms of dextrous physical activities, women tend to be better than men. Women are built to be flexible in all ways. They have no problems showing affection (not uncommonly sexual) to the same sex, they tend to be double-jointed more often than men, and their reflexes tend to be a bit better, though this latter part is not an overwhelming majority. The ultimate proof? The vagina. Can my penis pass a football through it? Not without causing permanent damage, and definately not without outside influence! Can a woman's vagina pass a football through it? Absolutely! I've seen bigger things go back in them, unfortunately. *Shudders!*

In that regard, women tend to perform dexterous work more efficiently and with less effort than men. Why do you think women were left to sew and crochet and cook and blah blah blah for so many thousands of years?! It's not because you're less than us, it's because you're better at those jobs than us! Except the cooking part. Men like food, and men tend to know food quite well. I would say that the best male cook can beat the best female cook any day of the week, but that's only because we're designed to eat, sleep, fuck and fight! >:-D

In terms of organizational planning, rational decision making, abstract thought, etc., men do, indeed, tend to be better than women. Women are emotional creatures (don't even try to deny it, ladies), and men, while assuredly having emotions and being capable of displaying them at times, tend to maintain their general composure during tense situations better than women. The greater the tension of the situation, the more likely the male will respond in a more appropriate fashion, if not always a better one (yes, we can and will hit people, and no, it's not always the best thing to do - but, by golly, it gets the job done! XD).

Look at male artists versus female artists. The great painters, the great sculpters, the great inventors - most all are men. This isn't because men are better artists than women, but because we tend to push the limits of our confines as part of our instinctual nature. We push the limits of accepted society in near-every facet, and, in response, we invent new, more abstract or straight-forward methods of doing things than what was socially acceptable at the time. It was men who sailed across the world first, men who colonized new territory, men who created the great empires were free-speach and free-thought were not only allowed but encouraged!

Women? Women bleed. And they hurt. And they get angry. And they get emotional. And they murder a man. -.- (I'm joking.. sort of, heh. )

In all honesty, we are, more or less, equal and complimentary. Again, however, I stress the importance of the situation more than just the individual. Even geniuses lack common sense, and the most fluent of speakers (ahem) can lack tact (duh! XD), but the most fluent, tactful, intelligent, charismatic, well-trained woman would get her ass beaten, raped, and, ultimately, murdered if she said the wrong thing to the wrong group of men, which is far less likely when the roles are reversed. What that says about men, well...

Thusly, while I maintain that men and women are, indeed, equal and complimentary, we are also equally and complimentarily better than the other depending on the needs and participants of any given situation. In general, though, I, personally, believe that the number of capable, culpable men outweigh the number of similar women. Whether this is caused by genetics, social brainwashing, or a combination thereof, I do not know. *Shrugs.*

Also, penises are fun to play with, and vaginas tend to be far more smelly more often. Point: Men! XD (Don't even try to get angry, you know it made you giggle. )

I hope this has been both enlightening and enjoyable, if a bit tedious (most of my writing unfortunately is), and that I haven't alienated anyone too badly. And, if I have? Well, then.. You can go fuck yourself! >;-D


Sincerely,
The Enigmatic Lord,

Mercutio

 

Why does every man need a woman? Because the dishes would get to piled up without one!
Why do men like to see two women kissing each other? Because that means two less mouths are bitching!
How many men does it take to open a beer? None, it should be opened when she brings it to you!

 

"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough." Einstein

And just for the record, neither Piaget nor Vygotsky, two psychologists whose theories for cognitive development (which includes the ability to reach abstract thought) are very important, at least in educational fields, mention any significant differences in gender when discussing development. One solitary thinker does not a theory prove, particularly in regards one to so vague and controversial as "women are inferior to men".

*not_secure_link*honolulu.hawaii.edu/intranet/committees/FacDevCom/guidebk/teachtip/piaget.htm

*not_secure_link*starfsfolk.khi.is/solrunb/vygotsky.htm

 

sounds like a weak attempt at a straw man to me

 

Einstein believed in alchemy

 

wow you are sexist i want meaning inferior in life just ethically/moraly inferior

 

Considering your statements and the inability to support those statements other than to say "look it up" your opinions are null and void.

 

Oh, Willis. You're adorable. I think we'll keep you.

 

Krieg may be guilty of many things, but I don't see a straw-man here.

 

Many many things.. but I know bullshit when I see it.

 

If you are bekannt with Abraham Lincolns first case as a lawer the farmers alminac one the mother is what i am talking about with lack of abstact thinking.

if you are ignorant of this i will roughly explain moral abstract thought in the example; It is against the law to rob a bank but john needs money to buy a vaccine for his wife's disease. He robs the bank to cure his wife because he knows it is a greater good.

In the same situation the wife would refuse to do so because it is against the law.

 

you cant prove y so x and z are wrong is exactly what he is saying

 

Willis a whole new category of stupid is being invented just for you.

 

How is one person's wife getting better the "greater good"? Could the problem simply be that people (regardless of gender) define "the greater good" in different ways?

 

?? your logic is debatable.. your have not given an "x" or a "z".. you have only provided a "y" from a very dubious source.

Pro tip: If you are attempting an intellectual debate, check your spelling.

 

of course, im not talking utilitarian greater good just in your eyesthe greater good

 

if i respected more then a couple of you clones i would take the time out of my day to check my spelling and grammer

 

What the fuck you still doing here, leave via the door marked "stooopidest". Go on run along now.



Twat.

 

I think he was just trying to say that it's difficult enough to follow your logic at times without being hampered with also having to decipher exactly which words you're attempting to use.